Suspecting criminal activity, a police officer acting without a warrant peeked through a small opening in the shutters of an apartment. The officer observed the apartment's tenant and the defendant making methamphetamine. The officer immediately entered the apartment and arrested the tenant and the defendant, and he confiscated the ingredients for the methamphet- amine, the tools used for methamphetamine production, and any completed methamphet- amine for evidence. The search is later ruled invalid at a suppression hearing. May the defendant now claim that her Fourth Amendment rights have been violated by the seizure of the ingredients, tools, and metham- phetamine from the apartment? (A) Yes, because the items will be used in evi- dence against her. (B) Yes, if she was an overnight guest of the tenant. (C) No, because she was not the owner or occupier of the apartment. (D) No, unless she admits to ownership of the items