Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Suzy promised her friend Tracey that she would give Tracey $250 for her birthday. In fact, Suzy did give Tracey $250 for her birthday. But

  1. Suzy promised her friend Tracey that she would give Tracey $250 for her birthday. In fact, Suzy did give Tracey $250 for her birthday. But now, Suzy's having second thoughts. She could really use this money and wants to get it back from Tracey. Suzy sues Tracey to recover the $250.
    1. Provide a clear precise statement of the governing legal principle.

  1. Apply the governing legal principle to these facts.

  1. Based on the governing legal principle, who will win?

  1. On February 1, 2004, Buyer entered into a contract to buy Seller's house in Las Vegas for $532,500 with a March closing date. On February 3, 2004 Seller notified Buyer that he was terminating the contract (without any legal basis for taking such action). The Seller then told Buyer that he would sell him the house for a higher price. On February 3, 2004, Buyer and Seller entered into a new contract for a price of $578,000. On February 16, 2004, the Seller refused to perform under the contract.The Buyer sued seeking to enforce the contract.
    1. Provide a clear precise statement of the governing legal principle.

  1. Apply the governing legal principle to these facts.

  1. Based on the governing legal principle, who will win?

  1. Dustin Developer entered into a signed detailed written contract with Corbin Contractor for the construction of a concrete foundation for the new hospital Dustin is building. The contract provides that Corbin will complete the concrete foundation (in accordance with detailed drawings) at a fixed contract price of $750,000. Although they didn't discuss it, both parties assumed the excavation could be accomplished with earth-moving equipment without the need to do blasting.However, a few days into the job, Corbin discovered bedrock five feet below the surface. The bedrock needs to be blasted in order to complete the project as planned. This is significantly more expensive than anticipated. Based on this, Corbin called a meeting with Dustin to advise him of this newly-discovered problem. Corbin told Dustin he can still complete the project as planned and on time, but due to the newly-uncovered bedrock, it will cost an additional $100,000.

Dustin and Corbin agreed to the additional cost and they signed a written contract modification providing for a revised contract price of $850,000. Corbin completed the work in accordance with the contract and sent Dustin the bill for $850,000. Dustin paid the original price of $750,000 but refused to pay the additional $100,000. Corbin sued Dustin to recover the balance of $100,000.

  1. Provide a clear precise statement of the governing legal principle.

  1. Apply the governing legal principle to these facts.

  1. Based on the governing legal principle, who will win?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Express Tort Law

Authors: Emily Finch, Stefan Fafinski

8th Edition

129229549X, 978-1292295497

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

what is the most common cause of preterm birth in twin pregnancies?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Which diagnostic test is most commonly used to confirm PROM?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What is the hallmark clinical feature of a molar pregnancy?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

a. Did you express your anger verbally? Physically?

Answered: 1 week ago