SW2XGMJ_3F_1YIOTRGIPJCZCDDd 103 ZFINOTRW/eun 1 + B T U A D G B O E - 1 Court Case Bracket Madness Part 1 (2 points for each court case): Directions: Research the following court cases below. Please answer the questions in complete sentences. Use oyez. org to find the information in the questions asked below. IN YOUR OWN WORDS AND INDIVIDUALLY!! 1 Mapp v. Ohio a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) -Dollree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials. Then she appealed her conviction to prove her freedom. Because the police illegally searched her house. b. What was the Constitutional question? - the fourth amendment c. What was the decision? (give an explanation of WHY not just yeso) - The court concluded that the first amendment issue and that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Did anyone dissent? - 3 people Frankfurter, Harlan, and Whittaker. d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? - This case is significant because it violated the fourth amendment so the court sided with her. However this led the Court on a troubled course of determining how and when to apply the exclusionary rule. 2 Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences. describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) discriminating against Asian American applicants in favor of white applicants. Harvard admits to it but argues that its process adheres to the requirements for race-based admissions. b. What was the Constitutional question? - The Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 C. What was the decision? -The decision was 6-2 in favor of The Harvard admissions program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. i. Did anyone dissent?- Jackson and Sotomayor d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? - This case is significant because there was discrimination and racism in a school environment in one of the most popular colleges in the states, Harvard. After the case it established a bad reputation at Harvard for a while. 3 Kent v. United States a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) - kent was detained and interrogated by the police in connection with several incidents involving robbery and rape. Once he was detain the juvenile court waived its jurisdiction, which allowed kent to be tried as an adult.b. What was the Constitutional question? - was the juvenile court's waiver of jurisdiction valid C. What was the decision?- the decision was 5-5, The Supreme Court determined there was not a sufficient investigation prior to the juvenile court waiver of jurisdiction. i. Did anyone dissent?- Black, Harlan, Stewart, and White dissent because they thought he should be tried as an adult due to the type of crime he committed. Why is this case significant? What did it establish?-This case is significant because it showed how much evidence/investigation is needed to be tried as an adult if committing a serious crime as a teen. While also establishing the right to be tried as an adult in the right circumstances. 4 Scott v. Sanford a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words)- Scott was a slave in Missouri, even though slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Once he returned to Missouri, he filled suit in Missouri court for his freedom. b. What was the Constitutional question?-Missouri Compromise of 1820 C. What was the decision?- The decision was 7-2, saying a "black person" cannot have a standing to sue in federal court. Did anyone dissent?- Mclean, Curtis d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish?- This case is significant because it is about slavery and discrimination. While it establishesf that back then blacks were not able to sue in federal courts. 5 Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 6 Schenck v. U.S. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish?t/d/1jVPxSw2XGMJ_3F_1YiofRGiPjC2cDDdTb3jZFrNCtRw/edit ial 11 7 New Jersey v. T.L.O a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? i. Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 8 Gideon v. Wainwright Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? i. Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 9 New York Times v. Sullivan a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? i. Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 10 Miranda v. Arizona Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? i. Did anyone dissent? . Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 11 Ingraham v. Wright a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? i. Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? what did it establish? 12 U.S. v. Richard Nixon2XGMJ_3F_1YiofRGiPjC2cDDdTb3jZFrNCtRw/edit B IUA E X a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? C . What was the decision? i. Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 13 Tinker v. Des Moines a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 14 Loving v. Virginia Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? What was the decision? Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 15 Engel v. Vitale Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? c. What was the decision? . Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish? 16 Korematsu v. U.S. a. Brief Overview. (In 2-3 sentences, describe the "facts of the case" in your own words) b. What was the Constitutional question? C. What was the decision? i. Did anyone dissent? d. Why is this case significant? What did it establish?Part 2 (5 points): From the information above. Complete the bracket below and have your final pick answer the question: Which court case is the most significant? (edit the picture and use text boxes to fill it out Tinker v. Des Mores Kent v. U.S. chenck v. U.B U.S. Y. Richard Nixon Korematsu y US Sliceon v. Wainanghi Mapp v. Cho v Kuhmeter SHA Ing. Y. President and Followa ol Harvard New Jersey Y. T.L.D BY Times v. Bulvan Ingraham v. hiright Soorly Sanford letands v. Anzona Question: Who is your winner for "most significant court case." Explain why in 3-5 sentences