Swift's gold-plated iPhone stopped working, so she took it to TechCity, a local shop in Nashville that bought and sold phones, and sold it to TechCity for $5,000. TechCity paid her with a check for that amount. The next day, Underwood was browsing through TechCity and saw Swift's former iPhone on display. TechCity ahd removed all electronic files from the iPhone as part of its resale process, so Underwood had no idea that the iPhone had previously belonged to Swift. Underwood offered to pay $10,000 for the iPhone, so TechCity sold it to her and Underwood took it home and began using it. After Underwood took the phone home, Swift discovered that the check she received from TechCity had bounced due to insufficient funds so she quickly returned to TechCity and asked for her phone back. TechCity informed her that they had sold the phone to Underwood and no longer had it. Swift contacted Underwood and demand that Underwood give her the phone back, but Underwood refused. At that point, who had superior rights in the iPhone?

Group of answer choices

a. Swift, because she was its original owner.

b. Swift, because TechCity had acted in bad faith in removing all of the electronic files from the iPhone.

c. Tech City, because it held voidable title and Underwood was not a good faith purchaser for value.

d. Underwood, even though TechCity did not have good title to the iPhone when the company sold the phone to her.

e. Underwood, because TechCity had void title in the iPhone when the company sold the phone to her.

f. Swift and Underwood share title to the iPhone as tenants in common.