T Q x OneLogin - Grammarly Content Bb 18679899 https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/ultra/courses/_155591_1/cl/outline All At least two peer replies are due Sunday at 11:59 pm EST. Responses should be at least 100 words. Ethical Dilemma Paper Attached Files: Ethical Dilemma Case Study.pdf (103.917 KB) Transtutors: Question Convers x + + Sign in 8 E M D Read the attached case and answer the questions at the end of the case. Also, remember to include the eight steps in making ethical decisions outlined in chapter one of your text. Instead of a "traditional flow" APA paper, use the following subheadings to ensure you cover all parts of the case. See rubric guidelines. The only APA format will be the title page and all sources (both in-text citations and reference list). Title Page Full Title of Paper -This will be page 2. All pages should have a header and page numbers. Start with an introduction paragraph. Give a brief overview of the case. Case Questions Type your first question. -Then fully answer the question. Do this for all questions associated with your assigned case. For example: What Are the Primary Issues That Are Raised for You by the Scenario? Answer the question from your perspective as the counselor, not the client. Remember to support all sections of your work. After answering all questions assigned to your case include the following: Eight Steps 1. Identify the problem - Then discuss how this step applies to the case. What is the identified ethical dilemma(s) in your assigned case? Do this for each of the 8 steps, not just the first step. Remember to cite all sources using APA 7.0 both in-text and in the references. Priva Tern Week 6 Quiz 67F Search Sunny + myhp W 10:42 AM 4/14/2023 Rubric Detail - 2023 Spring - Professional Ethics (SOWK-... - Personal - Microsoft Edge https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_1589415_1&course_id=_155591_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricld=_123229... A Grid View List View General Mechanics (punctuation, grammar, spelling) Organization, Citations, References, and Coherence Comprehensiveness Accuracy of Conclusions Excellent 10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%) Writing is free of punctuation, grammar, spelling, errors. 10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%) The organization of the information was easy-to-follow. The reader understood the point(s) made and how they related to the critical thinking questions. The work was well supported with appropriate citations and references. 52 (52.00%) - 65 (65.00%) All relevant sections included in the critical thinking questions were addressed completely. 11 (11.00%) -15 (15.00%) Your conclusions were supported by relevant data. Good 7 (7.00%) - 9 (9.00%) The writing assignment included less than 5 errors (even if small ones). 7 (7.00%) - 9 (9.00%) The organization of the information was mostly easy-to- follow. The reader most of the time could understood the point(s) made and how they related to the critical thinking questions. Work was supported and most citations and references were in the correct format. 36 (36.00%) - 50 (50.00%) Most of the relevant sections included in the critical thinking questions were addressed. 7 (7.00%) - 10 (10.00%) Most of your conclusions were supported by relevant data. Fair 5 (5.00%) -6 (6.00%) The writing assignment included less than 6 errors. 5 (5.00%) - 6 (6.00%) The organization of the information was somewhat easy- to-follow. The reader sometimes could understood the point(s) made and how they related to the critical thinking questions. The work contained support but the citations and/or references were incorrectly formatted. 21 (21.00%)-35 (35.00%) Some of the relevant sections included in the critical thinking questions were addressed. 4 (4.00%) - 6 (6.00%) Some of your conclusions were supported by relevant data. Poor 0 (0.00%) - 4 (4.00%) The writing assignment included 7 errors or more. 0 (0.00%) - 4 (4.00%) The organization of the information was not easy-to-follow. The reader could not understood the point(s) made and how they related to the critical thinking questions. The work contained little to no support. The citations were missing or incorrectly formatted. 0 (0.00%) - 20 (20.00%) None of the relevant sections included in the critical thinking questions were addressed. 0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%) None of your conclusions were supported by relevant data. Name:Case Study Rubric 67F Sunny Search myhp Exit 10:49 AM 4/14/2023