TABLE 2 ET AL. Intervention impact estimates Mean difference Odds ratio HAZ INTER-NDA WAZ Food diversity Stunted growth Underweight Unadjusted HBGM 0.153 (-0.101, 0.407) 0.018 (-0.116, 0.153) 0.178" (-0.021, 0.377) 0.159 (-0.543, 0.862) 0.794 (0.531, 1.189) 0.611 (0.300, 1.243) CBGM+NS -0.105 (-0.340, 0.131) -0.050 (-0.182, 0.083) 0.018 (-0.178, 0.215) -0.339 (-0.976, 0.297) 1.143 (0.769, 1.699) 0.804 (0.441, 1.467) Control Ref Ref. Ref Ref. Ref Ref Clusters, n 125 125 126 126 125 125 Observations, / 497 504 497 512 497 497 Adjusted HBGM 0.127 (-0.107, 0.361) -0.017 (-0.133, 0.098) 0.183* (0.037, 0.328) 0.219 (-0.500, 0.938) 0.734 (0.407, 1.324) 0.725 (0.235, 2.234) CBGM+NS -0.152 (-0.341, 0.036) -0.118* (-0.230, -0.006) -0.066 (-0.189, 0.056) -0.216 (-0.889, 0.457) 1.294 (0.689, 2.432) 1.091 (0.423, 2.816) Control Ref Ref. Ref Ref. Ref Ref Clusters, / 125 125 126 126 125 125 Observations, # 482 486 481 493 482 481 Results are from multivariate linear regression models. Coefficients displayed in columns 2-5 represent mean differences (95% CIs). Coefficients displayed in columns 6 and 7 represent ORs (95% CIs). All adjusted models include controls for age (months); sex; twin status; height, weight, and weight for height at baseline; health at baseline; caregiver education; household composition; and household wealth quintile. We used cluster-robust SEs to account for within-cluster correlation. We used / tests to test hypotheses. Stunted growth was defined as HAZ