Table II. Predicting the latent measure of support signaled
	(1) USA	(2) Russia	(3) China	(4) UK	(5) France
Polity	0.027** (0.002)	0.028** (0.003)	0.004** (0.001)	0.023** (0.005)	0.017** (0.003)
GDP/capita	0.051* (0.020)	0.056** (0.015)	0.003* (0.002)	0.032* (0.013)	0.036* (0.016)
Colonial history		0.994** (0.172)	0.357** (0.063)	0.091** (0.024)	0.111** (0.023)
GDP	1.043** (0.059)	0.263** (0.039)	0.082** (0.022)	0.500** (0.081)	0.436** (0.068)
Distance	0.169** (0.017)	0.410** (0.052)	0.101** (0.017)	0.278** (0.057)	0.164** (0.029)
Distance squared	0.010** (0.001)	0.035** (0.004)	0.006** (0.001)	0.021** (0.004)	0.010** (0.002)
Recent MIDs	0.052** (0.005)	0.008** (0.003)	0.009** (0.002)	0.014** (0.003)	0.012** (0.003)
Constant	0.320 (0.625)	0.451 (0.641)	0.044 (0.945)	0.357 (0.824)	0.554 (0.510)
N	7156	7156	7156	7100	7100
*p < .05, **p < .01.

The dependent variable in the above table, by Roseanne McManus and Mark Nieman, estimates how much effort a country would bear to ensure another country's security in a given year. Holding everything else in the regression constant, a country at what distance from the United States would be estimated to receive the least American support? (The models measure distance in degrees, units of 69.2 miles; it is assessed from one country's capital to the other's.) Round your answer to the nearest degree.