Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
TABLET Kitchen Electries Sales Patterns and Projections (individual units) 2018 2019 2020 (estimated) Product Type GOOD FOODS, INC.: Introduction of Electrical Appliances Good Foods, Inc.,
TABLET Kitchen Electries Sales Patterns and Projections (individual units) 2018 2019 2020 (estimated) Product Type GOOD FOODS, INC.: "Introduction of Electrical Appliances" Good Foods, Inc., primarily a food manufacturer, was considering a long-range plan to undertake the manufacturing and marketing of small electrical appliances. Product Lines: Good Foods marketed a wide range of food products. Among the best known were the "Ann Anderson" line of cake, frosting, and brownie mixes, Good Foods also marketed a munber of cereals, flour products, frozent and refrigerated foods. The name "Am Anderson." was one of Good Foods prime assets. It had been carefully cultivated with over twenty million dollars having been spent to put the name across to the public. Small Appliance Project: In 2016 a special project was started in which a group of engineers developed prototypes of various electrical appliances. Four products, a taster, electrie frying pan. irou, and coffeemaker were developed. 1. Irons 2. Coffeemakers 3. Toasters 4. Blenders 5. Can Openers 6. Mixers 7. Frypans 8. Broilers 9. Compoppsex 10. Slicing Knives 9,915,000 8,200,000 5.800,XIC 4,900,000 5,100).XIC 4,560,000 2.975,000 2,770,000 1,850,000 2.500,00 9,475.000 8.500.000 6,200,000 6.100.000 5,500,000 4,900.000 3,300,000 2,640.000 2.200.000 2,100,000 9.600.000 8,800,000 6,600,000 5,900,000 5.800.0DX) 5.100,000 3,500,000 2.500.000 2.600,000 2,000,000 TABLE DI Cost Data Variable Costs: Cost Case Transportation Broken Goods Warehousing Parts and Materials Packaging Labor and Overhead $7.20 .60 2.00 66.00 6.20 14.00 Several consumer tests of these four appliances lead been conducted throughout the product development process. All four appliances compared favorably with competitors curing home Lise tests. These tests were conducted with appliance owners droughout the United States. While the new appliances were not major break-tleroughs in design, they did incorporate the most up- lo-date features that characterize competitive appliances. All of Good Foods buite-use tests were conducted "Wind": the appliance owner was not told who manufactured the appliances. The competition in the appliance business was caracterized as intense with many firms sharing the market. Several large manufactures such as General Electric, Sunbeam. Toast Master and others were well established in the traditional appliances distribution channels (appliance outlets, discount houses, hardware outlets, etc.) Annual growth rate for small appliances has been approximately 3% during the past ten years. Table I indicates the pattern of sales for the last few years by product type. Cand Foods' executives considered a 10% penetration of this market potential a real possibility Good Foods, Inc. decided to competitively price the new line with the leading sellers in the field. The average unit-selling price at retail was determined to be $45. In other words, consumers would pay 545 to purchase any of the 4 new appliances at their local supermarket. This pricing policy allowed a 33% mark-up on the retail selling price for the supermarkets. This mark-up represented a substantially higher margin than supermarkets receive on items such as cereal, canned goods, etc. Good Tood Inc.'s unit costs are about the same for all four products. Management expected this margin to be a major inceutive for the supermarkets to handle the Dew appliance line Because Ann Anderson was such a well-established brand name, only moderate advertising was planned for the new line. It was argued that homemakers visit supermarkets at least once a week and that they naturally will notice the appliance display. An advertising budget of $5.5 million a year was proposed for the first few years of new prochost introduction. A prochet manager from the cereal division was chosen to handle the marketing of the new line. (Cost data for the project are given in Table II.) Fixed Casts: Bldg. Mach. & Equip. Start Up Costs Maintenance (onal) Other Expenses (noun) $9.850,000 1.300,000 200,000 100,000 Six imits were packaged in one case. For example, six coffeemakers are to be shipped in one case. To be depreciated over 10 years - standard accounting practice. These costs represented the costs to develop the prototypes. conduct consumer tests and other cost incurred in the new product development process. Answer the following questions. 1. Calculate breakeven in individual units (not cases) for Good Foods, Inc. in 2020. Be sure to show each step in the breakeven calculation. 2. What is the breakeven in dollars? 3. What market share will Good Foods, Inc. need in order to breakeven in 2020? 4. Calculate breakeven with a 5% return on sales. TABLET Kitchen Electries Sales Patterns and Projections (individual units) 2018 2019 2020 (estimated) Product Type GOOD FOODS, INC.: "Introduction of Electrical Appliances" Good Foods, Inc., primarily a food manufacturer, was considering a long-range plan to undertake the manufacturing and marketing of small electrical appliances. Product Lines: Good Foods marketed a wide range of food products. Among the best known were the "Ann Anderson" line of cake, frosting, and brownie mixes, Good Foods also marketed a munber of cereals, flour products, frozent and refrigerated foods. The name "Am Anderson." was one of Good Foods prime assets. It had been carefully cultivated with over twenty million dollars having been spent to put the name across to the public. Small Appliance Project: In 2016 a special project was started in which a group of engineers developed prototypes of various electrical appliances. Four products, a taster, electrie frying pan. irou, and coffeemaker were developed. 1. Irons 2. Coffeemakers 3. Toasters 4. Blenders 5. Can Openers 6. Mixers 7. Frypans 8. Broilers 9. Compoppsex 10. Slicing Knives 9,915,000 8,200,000 5.800,XIC 4,900,000 5,100).XIC 4,560,000 2.975,000 2,770,000 1,850,000 2.500,00 9,475.000 8.500.000 6,200,000 6.100.000 5,500,000 4,900.000 3,300,000 2,640.000 2.200.000 2,100,000 9.600.000 8,800,000 6,600,000 5,900,000 5.800.0DX) 5.100,000 3,500,000 2.500.000 2.600,000 2,000,000 TABLE DI Cost Data Variable Costs: Cost Case Transportation Broken Goods Warehousing Parts and Materials Packaging Labor and Overhead $7.20 .60 2.00 66.00 6.20 14.00 Several consumer tests of these four appliances lead been conducted throughout the product development process. All four appliances compared favorably with competitors curing home Lise tests. These tests were conducted with appliance owners droughout the United States. While the new appliances were not major break-tleroughs in design, they did incorporate the most up- lo-date features that characterize competitive appliances. All of Good Foods buite-use tests were conducted "Wind": the appliance owner was not told who manufactured the appliances. The competition in the appliance business was caracterized as intense with many firms sharing the market. Several large manufactures such as General Electric, Sunbeam. Toast Master and others were well established in the traditional appliances distribution channels (appliance outlets, discount houses, hardware outlets, etc.) Annual growth rate for small appliances has been approximately 3% during the past ten years. Table I indicates the pattern of sales for the last few years by product type. Cand Foods' executives considered a 10% penetration of this market potential a real possibility Good Foods, Inc. decided to competitively price the new line with the leading sellers in the field. The average unit-selling price at retail was determined to be $45. In other words, consumers would pay 545 to purchase any of the 4 new appliances at their local supermarket. This pricing policy allowed a 33% mark-up on the retail selling price for the supermarkets. This mark-up represented a substantially higher margin than supermarkets receive on items such as cereal, canned goods, etc. Good Tood Inc.'s unit costs are about the same for all four products. Management expected this margin to be a major inceutive for the supermarkets to handle the Dew appliance line Because Ann Anderson was such a well-established brand name, only moderate advertising was planned for the new line. It was argued that homemakers visit supermarkets at least once a week and that they naturally will notice the appliance display. An advertising budget of $5.5 million a year was proposed for the first few years of new prochost introduction. A prochet manager from the cereal division was chosen to handle the marketing of the new line. (Cost data for the project are given in Table II.) Fixed Casts: Bldg. Mach. & Equip. Start Up Costs Maintenance (onal) Other Expenses (noun) $9.850,000 1.300,000 200,000 100,000 Six imits were packaged in one case. For example, six coffeemakers are to be shipped in one case. To be depreciated over 10 years - standard accounting practice. These costs represented the costs to develop the prototypes. conduct consumer tests and other cost incurred in the new product development process. Answer the following questions. 1. Calculate breakeven in individual units (not cases) for Good Foods, Inc. in 2020. Be sure to show each step in the breakeven calculation. 2. What is the breakeven in dollars? 3. What market share will Good Foods, Inc. need in order to breakeven in 2020? 4. Calculate breakeven with a 5% return on sales
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started