Taco Bell Questions Question One: What does Summary Judgment mean? (3 points)- Summary judgment is a decision entered by courts based on statements and evidence for one party against another without a full trial Question Two: If Taco Bell won Summary Judgment in its favor, what would happen to Wrench's (the cartoonists') case? (3 points) Question Three: (12 points) a) What were the elements of an implied in fact contract that the Taco Bell cartoonists (the plaintiffs) needed to prove to win their lawsuit? (These are in addition to offer and acceptance, consideration, and mutuality of intent, those are not the items I am asking for). List the elements in your answer that prove an implied in fact contract. b) List the facts specific to this case that meet those elements you listed in part a). Question Four: How does an implied-in-fact contract differ from an implied-at- law contract? As part of your answer, list the elements of an implied-in law contract? (offer and acceptance, consideration, and mutuality of intent are not the items I am asking for) (2 points) I Question Five: How did the use of implied-in-fact contract theory help the cartoonists win their case against Taco Bell? (6 points)