Take the following elements of an argument. $"(1)$ NDSU should built a lazy river. $(2)$ UND built a lazy river, which raised their application numbers. $(3)$ Because we're in direct competition with UND for students, we need to match their leisure$/$recreational infrastructure." In this argument,

$(3)$ is the warrantlogic

$(3)$ is the evidence

$(2)$ is the claim

$(1)$ is the warrant$/$logic