Tammy Teenager, a 19 year old woman, was shopping in the cosmetics aisle at Generic Drug Store when she was approached by a security guard. He said that he saw her on camera and that she put a lip gloss into the pocket of her hoodie sweatshirt. He asked her to empty her pockets. She refused, and he grabbed her arm and forced her into a back room, where she was held for three hours before being released. Tammy sued the store for false imprisonment, and the court found the store liable because they were unable to prove that they had the authority of law under the shopkeeper's privilege defense.

Which of the following is most likely part of the court's holding?

Group of answer choices

Three hours was not a reasonable amount of time to detain Tammy.

It was not reasonable for the guard to detain Tammy because he had no reason to suspect that she had stolen something.

It was reasonable for the guard to grab Tammy's arm because she refused to empty her pockets.

The fact that Tammy went with the guard into the back room showed that she consented to being detained.