Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

tax shield of: $840,000; $1,200,000; $2,640,000; $1,920,000 to accept a: greater; lower the deductibilty of: dividends; interest favors the use of: equity; debt tax treatment

image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
tax shield of: $840,000; $1,200,000; $2,640,000; $1,920,000
to accept a: greater; lower
the deductibilty of: dividends; interest
favors the use of: equity; debt
tax treatment of: debt; equity
favors the use of: debt; equity
7. The effect of taxes Modgliani and Miller Proposition I with Taxes Debt financing has one important advantage that the marty Modigliani and Miller (MM) propositions ignored the interest on business debt is tax deductible. This benefit means that the amount of taxes that a business is required to pay will be reduced by a phenomenon called an interest tax shield, which is a function of the amount of debt in the firm's capital structure and its tax rate. In contrast, the dividends that a corporation pays on Its common and preferred shares are not tax deductible Consider the case of Yellow Dragon Foodstuffs, Inc.: At the beginning of the year, Yellow Dragon Foodstuffs, Inc. had an unlevered value of $3,500,000. It pays federal and state taxes at the marginal rate of 30%, and currently has $4,000,000 in debt capital in its capital structure. According to MM Proposition I with taxes, Yellow Dragon Foodstuff is allowed to recognize a tax shield of the firm is and the levered value of $9,700,000 $12,500,000 $2,300,000 54,500,000 In 1977, Merton Miller added to the discussion regarding the effect of taxes on a firm's value by including the effect of personal income taxes. He was interested in how the presence of individual income taxes would affect business's use of debt financing, and developed the following model for the value of a levered firm: V V +D11 - Gato - where T., T., and to represent the tax rates imposed on corporate income, personal income from equity investments, and personal income from debt investments, respectively, pre-tax return on equity A basic premise of Miller's work, under the current US Tax Code, is that investors are willing to accept investments than on bond investments because tax rates imposed on O bond Investments are lower than those imposed on equity Investments. equity investments are lower than those imposed on bond investments. The result of itler's work is the conclusion that the US Tux Code produces two competing pressures that affect a business's use of leverage. These two conflicting effects are the deductibility of the preferential tax treatment of -which creates a tax shield-favons the use of financing in a firm's capital structure; income (dividends and capital gains) favors the use of financing

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Robonomics Prepare Today For The Jobless Economy Of Tomorrow

Authors: John Crews

1st Edition

1530910463, 978-1530910465

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

Have to Do: Support professional learning.

Answered: 1 week ago