Question
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES v. TIKINDRA G. 347 S.W.3d 188, 2011 Tenn. App. LEXIS 111 (2011) Appeal denied by In re Samaria S. and
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES v. TIKINDRA G.
347 S.W.3d 188, 2011 Tenn. App. LEXIS 111 (2011) Appeal denied by In re Samaria S. and Samarion S., 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 701
(Tenn., July 14, 2011)
1. What did the court conclude regarding whether parental conduct must be "knowing" in order to be considered "severe child abuse"?
2. Why did the mother argue that her failure to adequately nourish her newborn twins was not knowing?
3. Why did the court disagree with her position? On what did it base it's conclusion that she acted knowingly?
4. Do you think the result would have been different if the mother had not been instructed in how to care for her newborns?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started