Terry v. State, 26 So.3d 378 (Miss. Appellate Court 2009).

In 2004, James Clayton Terry was elected to serve as a member of the Lowndes County, Mississippi, Board of Supervisors, as the supervisor for District Four. As a member of the board, Terry was given a county vehicle and a Fuelman card, to be used for business purposes only. The county later began to receive complaints that Terry was making inappropriate purchases of gasoline and using the vehicle to take personnel trips to casinos. Following an investigation, Terry was indicted for embezzlement.

The trial court found Terry guilty. On appeal, Terry argued that the conviction should be overturned because the state had failed to specify the dates during which embezzlement supposedly occurred. The state argued that because the embezzlement was continuous, specific dates were not necessary.

What exactly was embezzled, and should it matter whether the state alleged specific dates on which the embezzlement occurred?