Test Case 7.2. Under the Roth/Miller standard, can the government of Indianapolis choose to ban only certain things from among the broad category of things that could be deemed "obscene"? Is it acceptable under any other reasoning than the Roth/Miller standard to define the "harm" that pornography does as a harm to "civic equality," and ban those specific things that do this harm? All answers should consider the case that your opponent would give using the same legal standards.