Teyung, a wealthy was rumored to be part of the mafia operating in the Philippines as illegal recruiter and child-trafficker. The AMLC through the Solicitor General was able to secure freeze order with the Court of Appeals. Since the trafficking ring he was involved in was very elaborate, the AMLC requested for an extension of another six months of the freeze order. The CA granted the request of the AMLC. Teyung filed a case with the Supreme Court for grave abuse of discretion on the part of the CA for extending the validity of the freeze order.

A. Is Teyung correct? Why.

B. What can be the subject of the freeze order?