Thanks very much for your thoughts here! I appreciate your point on not needing to disclose the value as the buyer, which could result in an "unconscionable transaction"... what are the specific circumstances would have needed to occur for this to take place? Would the circumstances around an unconscionable circumstance result in Murry's responsibility to share the information they had about the stein? Finally, are there circumstances under which withholding information could result in a criminal or civil offence?