Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
that was under construction. Clearwater Plumbing Company, a subcontractor, had been hired by FastBuck Plumbing, another subcontractor, to help it complete the plumbing work on
that was under construction. Clearwater Plumbing Company, a subcontractor, had been hired by FastBuck Plumbing, another subcontractor, to help it complete the plumbing work on the project. When FastBuck began using shoddy installation procedures and fell behind the scheduled completion time for the project, Perfection Contractor's urged Clearwater to correct FastBuck's mistakes and to finish the job. Clearwater refused to continue until he knew who would pay him, since he feared FastBuck's financial position was shaky. Nonetheless, Perfection Contractor's job superintendent told Clearwater to go ahead even if Clearwater Plumbing and Perfection Contractor's had no contract because "he would use his influence to try to help Clearwater get his money." Clearwater finished the work and sent a $9,800 bill to FastBuck. The bill was never paid. When Clearwater later sent the bill to Perfection Contractor's, these facts emerged: Perfection Contractor's told him that due to Clearwater's failure to notify Preferred Contractor's promptly of FastBuck's non-payment, Perfection Contractor's had already paid FastBuck in full and therefore would not pay twice for the work. Discuss two theories of recovery Clearwater may argue. Which is the stronger argument? Explain
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started