Question
That's all the available information. General Hospital provides private healthcare and currently offers three operations: feet, shoulder and hip and the following data is available
That's all the available information.
General Hospital provides private healthcare and currently offers three operations: feet, shoulder and hip and the following data is available for them:
Operations | Patient Fee per operation | Number of operations budgeted |
| ||
Feet | 3,600 | 160 |
Shoulder | 4,500 | 200 |
Hip | 4,850 | 240 |
Total | 600 |
Although 2019/20 was a successful year, the Hospital Board expressed concern that overheads had risen and concluded that identifying better costing data and cost management should be a priority for 2020/21. A competitor has recently opened a new facility and as a result there is likely to be pressure on pricing. The hospital is considering diversifying and offering additional operations and services and needs to ensure that pricing is competitive for these.
The Finance Director has read a recent report on overhead allocation and Activity Based Costing (ABC) and is keen to consider a range of options going forward. The current approach to overhead allocation is to apportion overheads on a unit basis (ie shared across the total number of operations in the budget).
The Finance Director would now like to consider the merits of 3 potential options:
- Option 1 Keep the existing approach of overhead allocation which allocates an identical share of the total overhead cost to an operation
- Option 2 Allocate overheads to operations using surgeons operation time in hours (ie total labour hours) as a basis
- Option 3 - Introduce Activity Based Costing (ABC) using 4 cost drivers (which are provided in this document)
You have been employed to lead on the project and will produce a professional report which analyses the difference between the 3 options above.
The ultimate aim is to help the Finance Director make a decision whether to maintain the current simplistic approach (Option 1) to overhead allocation or whether to implement Option 2 or Option 3. The following data is available for you to use in your analysis:
Direct costs per operation | Feet | Shoulder | Hip |
Direct material: Surgical material | 600 | 800 | 950 |
Direct labour: Surgeon fee* | 800 | 1,200 | 1,400 |
*This is paid to the surgeon upon completion of each operation and is based on operation time and complexity
Overhead analysis
Cost pools | Cost pools for ABC |
|
Pool 1 | Theatre preparation | 200,000 |
Pool 2 | Surgeons Operation time | 170,000 |
Pool 3 | Consultant follow up | 300,000 |
Pool 4 | Overnight hospital stay | 540,000 |
Total overheads | 1,210,000 |
This cost driver data is per operation:
Feet | Shoulder | Hip | ||
Cost driver 1 | Theatre preparation (hours) | 0.5 | 2 | 4 |
Cost driver 2 | Surgeons operation time (hours) | 4 | 6 | 5 |
Cost driver 3 | Consultation follow up (hours) | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Cost driver 4 | Overnight hospital stay (days) | 0 | 4 | 6 |
Required:
1. Total cost per operation for Option 1, 2 and 3 (rounding accepted)
2. Profit margin ( and %) per operation for Option 1, 2 and 3 (rounding accepted)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started