The 2023 Financial Crisis (nicknamed the "Sustainability Shocker") highlighted several vulnerabilities in traditional economic models, triggering a worldwide reassessment of the role of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in finance. Several scholars argue that the mispricing of environmental risks was a significant cause of the crisis, as investors and financial institutions failed to adequately price the systemic risks associated with unsustainable business practices. In light of this, it has been suggested that the incorporation of ESG factors into financial models could help prevent similar crises in the future. However, opponents argue that financial markets function best when left to their own devices, claiming that the incorporation of ESG factors could distort market signals and lead to inefficient allocations of resources. They argue that the role of financial markets is to facilitate the allocation of resources towards the most profitable ventures, not to enforce societal norms or ethical standards. Critically discuss the role of ESG factors in financial models in the context of the 2023 Sustainability Shocker. Analyze the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating ESG factors into financial models, and provide examples of how this could impact the functioning of financial markets. Use relevant theories and real-world examples to support your arguments.