The area of law that covers this is generally referred to as (55) law because Ron does not have a contract with the injured child and this area deals with the rights and obligations existing among people regardless of whether the person is aware of the rules or not. The claim that most likely will be brought is the unintentional act of negligence because it is claimed that Ron fell below the applicable standard of care. In looking at this area of law, it seems that the injured child or his parents need to show that Ron owed the child a duty of care and which he breached and that the child suffered damages and that those were caused by Ron's lack of due care. If the requirements have been met, this legal theory will be included as a (56) if the complaint is filed in California rather than New York, and if the complaint is filed in Federal court the legal theory would be referred to as a (57). Yet no lawsuit has been filed. When filed, it must be filed within two years. Under the (58) if a lawsuit is not filed within that time after the claim arises, it will be barred. Ron fully expects to be sued, and he should know how the matter will be prepared for trial. Typically the lawyers will be doing a variety of things once all relevant information has been exchanged through the process already mentioned. The lawyers will be preparing documents in anticipation of trial which are given to the Judge prior to the trial. These include documents outlining what law will be told to the jurors by the judge, which are generally referred to as (59). Also, sometimes there are issues that come up during the litigation that are not relevant to the dispute and only have a tendency to distract the trier of fact. Other times, information is revealed during the course of the exchange of information which one party or the other would not like to have considered by the trier of fact. Under these circumstances the lawyer, prior to trial, will prepare pleadings and other documents generally referred to as (60). These documents are usually given to the judge the first day of trial and there is a meeting with the judge prior to the beginning of the trial to discuss the issues raised. Once this preliminary meeting is concluded, the Judge will ask the court clerk to call potential jurors from the jury room. At this particular time, generally 12 jurors and 2 alternative jurors are selected and the lawyers are given the opportunity to ask the jurors questions. This procedure was already mentioned, but was not explained. It will be now. One of the things the lawyers are trying to ascertain during this questioning is whether any of the jurors are biased. In addition, the lawyers are trying to determine whether they feel, for whatever reason, the jurors will be good jurors or not so good jurors in light of the unique facts of the case. If, during this questioning the lawyers discover that one or more of the jurors either knows the 4811-6136-261471 JED(25608034 parties or expresses some bias, then the juror may be excused by a (61). On the other hand, there are some jurors who, for whatever reason, a particular lawyer may not think will be in his or her client's best interest. Although there are a limited number of these, the lawyer can excuse these jurors by exercising what is generally referred to as a (62). JUJUU, VIII VEULIINILULILIVYL motion for summary judgment Answers: motions to exclude/in limine non-binding arbitration Notice of Appeal opening statement order of examination (OEX) peremptory challenges personal property lien personal service plaintiff privileged procedural rules 10 years 10% absolute privilege abstracts of judgment alternative dispute resolution American Arbitration Assoc. arbitration award binding arbitration bond or undertaking cause of action challenge for cause civil law system claim of relief clerk's transcript case law common law system complaint concurrent jurisdiction cross-complaint cross-examination default default judgment calendar defendant process server qualified privilege renewed reporter's transcript request to enter default request to produce service by publication service of process statute of limitations statutes subpoena substantive substantive rules Concurrent jurisdiction service or process statute of limitations statutes subpoena substantive substantive rules substituted service summons the rights and benefits U.S. Constitution cross-complaint cross-examination default default judgment calendar defendant deposition direct examination discovery diversity of citizenship due process exclusive federal jurisdiction interrogatories JAMS JNOV judgment by default jurisdiction jury instructions long arm statute mediation verdict voir dire work product privilege writs of execution mediator minimum contracts The area of law that covers this is generally referred to as (55) law because Ron does not have a contract with the injured child and this area deals with the rights and obligations existing among people regardless of whether the person is aware of the rules or not. The claim that most likely will be brought is the unintentional act of negligence because it is claimed that Ron fell below the applicable standard of care. In looking at this area of law, it seems that the injured child or his parents need to show that Ron owed the child a duty of care and which he breached and that the child suffered damages and that those were caused by Ron's lack of due care. If the requirements have been met, this legal theory will be included as a (56) if the complaint is filed in California rather than New York, and if the complaint is filed in Federal court the legal theory would be referred to as a (57). Yet no lawsuit has been filed. When filed, it must be filed within two years. Under the (58) if a lawsuit is not filed within that time after the claim arises, it will be barred. Ron fully expects to be sued, and he should know how the matter will be prepared for trial. Typically the lawyers will be doing a variety of things once all relevant information has been exchanged through the process already mentioned. The lawyers will be preparing documents in anticipation of trial which are given to the Judge prior to the trial. These include documents outlining what law will be told to the jurors by the judge, which are generally referred to as (59). Also, sometimes there are issues that come up during the litigation that are not relevant to the dispute and only have a tendency to distract the trier of fact. Other times, information is revealed during the course of the exchange of information which one party or the other would not like to have considered by the trier of fact. Under these circumstances the lawyer, prior to trial, will prepare pleadings and other documents generally referred to as (60). These documents are usually given to the judge the first day of trial and there is a meeting with the judge prior to the beginning of the trial to discuss the issues raised. Once this preliminary meeting is concluded, the Judge will ask the court clerk to call potential jurors from the jury room. At this particular time, generally 12 jurors and 2 alternative jurors are selected and the lawyers are given the opportunity to ask the jurors questions. This procedure was already mentioned, but was not explained. It will be now. One of the things the lawyers are trying to ascertain during this questioning is whether any of the jurors are biased. In addition, the lawyers are trying to determine whether they feel, for whatever reason, the jurors will be good jurors or not so good jurors in light of the unique facts of the case. If, during this questioning the lawyers discover that one or more of the jurors either knows the 4811-6136-261471 JED(25608034 parties or expresses some bias, then the juror may be excused by a (61). On the other hand, there are some jurors who, for whatever reason, a particular lawyer may not think will be in his or her client's best interest. Although there are a limited number of these, the lawyer can excuse these jurors by exercising what is generally referred to as a (62). JUJUU, VIII VEULIINILULILIVYL motion for summary judgment Answers: motions to exclude/in limine non-binding arbitration Notice of Appeal opening statement order of examination (OEX) peremptory challenges personal property lien personal service plaintiff privileged procedural rules 10 years 10% absolute privilege abstracts of judgment alternative dispute resolution American Arbitration Assoc. arbitration award binding arbitration bond or undertaking cause of action challenge for cause civil law system claim of relief clerk's transcript case law common law system complaint concurrent jurisdiction cross-complaint cross-examination default default judgment calendar defendant process server qualified privilege renewed reporter's transcript request to enter default request to produce service by publication service of process statute of limitations statutes subpoena substantive substantive rules Concurrent jurisdiction service or process statute of limitations statutes subpoena substantive substantive rules substituted service summons the rights and benefits U.S. Constitution cross-complaint cross-examination default default judgment calendar defendant deposition direct examination discovery diversity of citizenship due process exclusive federal jurisdiction interrogatories JAMS JNOV judgment by default jurisdiction jury instructions long arm statute mediation verdict voir dire work product privilege writs of execution mediator minimum contracts