The attorney, Dewey Cheatham, has dropped the ball. Lacy went to retain him on a personal injury claim because she slipped and fell in a grocery store called Chadwick's, breaking her arm. She didn't see a wet floor and it wasn't marked in any way. She had been in Cheatham's office for an initial interview with his paralegal, when she told her that he would represent her and offered a contingency fee of 40%. She asked if he could do 35% if the case settled, and he agreed. Cheatham knew the date the incident happened, but when he saw that she had been injured at Chadwick's, misunderstood the situation. Because he didn't read the paralegal's notes, he assumed that she was the victim of medical malpractice by Dr. Sven Chadwick--a surgeon renowned for his terrible diagnostics (Cheatham is suing him on behalf of 11 other clients). The statute of limitations for medical malpractice in her state is three years. For personal injury, like in a slip and fall, it's two years. Cheatham didn't know this, and let the statute lapse. What is the basis for her bar complaint against Cheatham? What Indiana ethics rules did he break, and how did he break them