The attorneys representing the applicant parties in the Zimbabwean Exemption permit case before the High Court of South Africa, argued that the decision by Minister of Home Affairs, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, not to extend the said permits, was unlawful. Furthermore, they argued that the Minister's decision did not comply with the PAJA rules requiring prior consultation with the affected Zimbabwean nationals and that there was no public participation. Discuss the rules of procedural fairness under the PAJA as applicable to the facts in the above case. Question 2 [20] As a departmental attorney in a public corporation, you have been requested by the internal disciplinary committee to provide a dossier containing a comprehensive legal write-up on the right to reason and departure from the requirement of providing a reason in terms of section 5(1) of PAJA.