The bankruptcy code is vast and it can be widely interpreted. Sometimes provisions within the constitutions itself can create conflict in applying the bankruptcy code, especially to state agencies that may assert state's right under sovereign immunity. In 2006 the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided in Central Va. Community College v. Katz by a narrow margin of 5-4 that the state's sovereign immunity did not superseded the intent of the bankruptcy code. Therefore, a state agency cannot use sovereign immunity as a defense from being sued by an individual due to the responsibilities in the bankruptcy code. Explain why the court got this correct AND explain why the court was wrong. Lastly, if you were the 10th justice how would you vote and why?