The BCS ranking system was more complicated in 2001 than in 2008. The table below gives the BCS rankings at the end of the regular season. (A lower BCS Index gave a higher rank.) Table headings: AP and USA gives the rank of each team in the two opinion polls of writers and coaches, respectively. SS stands for strength of schedule ranking, with 1 being the most challenging. L is the number of losses during the season. CA (Computer Average) is the average of computer rankings from various sources. QW(Quality Wins) gives a measurement of the number of victories over highly ranked teams. Rank Team AP USA SSL CA QW BCS Index 1 Miami 1 1 18 0 1.00 0.1 2.62 2 Nebraska 4 4 14 1 2.17 0.5 7.23 3 Colorado 3 3 22 4.50 2.3 7.28 4 Oregon 2 2 31 1 4.83 0.4 8.67 5 Florida 5 5 19 2 5.83 0.5 13.09 6 Tennessee 8 8 3 2 6.17 1.6 14.69 7 Texas 9 9 33 2 6.67 1.2 17.79 8 Illinois 7 7 37 1 9.83 0.0 19.31 9 Stanford 11 11 22 2 7.83 1.3 20.41 10 Maryland 6 6 78 1 11.17 0.0 21.29 11 Oklahoma 10 10 36 2 9.00 0.9 21.54 12 Washington St 13 13 LSU 12 13 12 10 3 42 2 10.83 0.6 26.91 13.33 1.0 27.73 14 15 South Carolina 14 Washington 14 40 3 19.17 0.0 37.77 21 20 21 3 14.83 1.0 38.17 Find the 2001 BCS ranking formula. Test it for three schools not used to develop your formula to check for correctness. (HINT: To avoid a system with infinitely many solutions, include Washington among the schools used to develop the formula. Give you answer in terms of AP, USA, SS, L, CA, and QW.) BCS Index= Explain why including Washington will accomplish avoiding a system with infinitely many solutions.