THE BUT FOR TEST A man went to a hospital complaining of stomach pain. The doctor on duty believed that there was nothing seriously wrong with the patient and simply told him to go home and sleep. The man later died of arsenic poisoning. His widow has shown that the doctor (i) owed a duty of care to her husband, and (ii) carelessly failed to realize that her husband's stomach pains were due to arsenic poisoning. Questions for Discussion Will the doctor be held liable if the evidence indicates that the man would have lived but for the doctor's carelessness? Will the doctor be held liable if the evidence indicates that the man's arsenic poisoning was so serious that he could not have been saved even if he had been properly diagnosed