the case Hansen v. Tex. Roadhouse_ Inc._ 2013 WI App 2 How was Texas Roadhouse's negligence NOT the cause of Kropp's action? How was Kropp NOT acting within the scope of his employment? How was Texas Roadhouse liable, if they were not the cause of the Kropp's action and Kropp was not acting within the scope of his employment? How does the Court define "Negligent Supervision"? Why did the Court reject Hansen's argument related to Negligent Supervision? How was the issue of causation a hurdle for Hansen?How does Judge Reilly disagree with the majority on the issue of Texas Roadhouse's Negligence? How does Judge Reilly disagree with the majority on the "causation" issue