Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

The cases are all combined as People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido , et al. The following points have been appealed to the Supreme Court

The cases are all combined as People v. Dripster, Dummy & Stupido , et al. The following points have been appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. You are an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, and this case has come before the Court. The Chief Justice has assigned you to write majority opinion resolving the case. In your paper,

  • Write opinion (an analysis of the questions below that will serve as the reasoning and the ruling of the Supreme Court) that resolves the case based upon previous cases from the United States Supreme Court, other federal and state courts, and other scholarly sources.
  • Explain your opinion on each of the following points:
  • Evaluate whether all the evidence from the house should have been suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree, because the placing of a tracking device on the Blazer driven by Dripster without a warrant and without probable cause violated the Fourth Amendment.
  • Assess whether all the evidence from the house should have been suppressed because the use of the Bloodhound device without a warrant and without probable cause violated the Fourth Amendment.
  • Determine whether all evidence from the house should have been suppressed because the warrant issued by the magistrate was based upon information obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
  • Rule on whether all evidence from the house should have been suppressed because the police officers did not knock and announce; the warrant was not a no-knock warrant.
  • Conclude whether the gun used by Stupido should have been suppressed because the officers had no right to search his car at the scene.
  • Examine whether Dummy's conviction for marijuana possession should be overturned, because he was not read Miranda warnings before making a deal.
  • Evaluates whether Stupido's confession should have been suppressed, because his lawyer was not allowed to see him.
  • Explain the validity of Dripster's death sentence for shooting and paralyzing Innocent violates the Eighth Amendment.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Public Law

Authors: Mark Elliott, Robert Thomas

4th Edition

0198836740, 978-0198836742

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Population

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

The feeling of boredom.

Answered: 1 week ago