Question
The City of Waterloo is considering the adoption of improvements to Waterloo Park and is presented with three mutually-exclusive options. Option A adds a splash
The City of Waterloo is considering the adoption of improvements to Waterloo Park and is presented with three mutually-exclusive options. Option A adds a splash pad which is estimated to offer benefits of $15 million and costs $11 million to build. Option B adds basketball courts has estimated benefits of $20 million and costs of $17 million. Option C is a nature exploration area that is estimated to offer benefits of $6 million and has costs of $2 million. In addition, a fourth option D is an improved path and signage project that has estimated costs of $7 million and standalone benefits of $3 million, but it can be combined with any of the first three, changing their respective benefits as follows: if built with A, it augments its benefits by $13 million, if built with B it increases the benefits of project B by $9 million, but if built with C it reduces the benefits of project C by $2 million (presumably because it reduces green space).
- Generate a table with 2 columns: the benefit-cost ratio and net benefits for each possible option.
- Which option should be chosen according to the Cost-Benefit decision rule?
- Discuss the optimality of using NB versus B/C ratio as a decision criterion in this case.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started