The cognitive revolution a revolution in the Kuhnian sense? Identify the features of the cognitive revolution that do/do not make it a Kuhnian revolution.

Rosenhan (1973) makes a number of striking claims about the way that "mental patients" are treated in his article "On being sane in insane places."

Rosenhan states that "the normal are not detectably sane" and psychiatrists are biased towards making a statistical type 2 error.

Question: If calling a sane person sick is a Type 2 error, 1) what is the doctor's null hypothesis? And 2) combined with the "the stickiness of labels." What does this imply about institutional attitudes towards patents?

Thank you