The company's defense was that they were in compliance with the state regulatory standards. The plaintiffs claim that the state regulatory law is not the final word on liability. There is still wrongful conduct that falls under the general heading of "tort law," - in this case, nuisance. Do you agree with the plaintiffs or the company? Why? State regulatory standards are enforced by the government. But redress for civil wrongs (torts) may be pursued by private parties through lawsuits. Is one system preferable to the other? Is the combination of both better? Why or why not