Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

The corporation defendant consented to a judgement against it.The issue was whether its owner/director, Smith, was personally liable.The defendant corporation provided cabinets for Smith's personal

The corporation defendant consented to a judgement against it.The issue was whether its owner/director, Smith, was personally liable.The defendant corporation provided cabinets for Smith's personal residence.The transaction was with the defendant corporation.The house went into foreclosure but the corporation was owed $250,000.Smith did not give any personal guarantee; he owed $250,000 to the defendant corporation for the cabinets.

Is this a case in which the Courts would "lift the corporate veil"?Why or why not?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Criminal Law

Authors: William Wilson

7th Edition

1292286741, 978-1292286747

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Describe ERP and how it can create efficiency within a business

Answered: 1 week ago