The corpus delicti rule is an essential part of any criminal court case. It requires the prosecution to prove the commission of a crime. Issues associated with corpus delicti include proving murder vs. accidental death or suicide; using out-of-court confessions with or without corroborating evidence; the type and quality of corroborating evidence; and cases of presumed homicide wherein a body has not been found. Consider that you are an appellate court judge hearing a defendant's appeal in a criminal murder case. In this case, a person disappeared; the body was not produced, and there was no physical evidence found related to the disappearance. A defendant was arrested, tried, and convicted by a jury of murdering the vanished victim fifteen years after the disappearance, based on circumstantial evidence. This defendant is now appealing that conviction on the grounds of insufficient evidence to prove murder. Let's review a few concepts before you make a decision about this scene. Which of the following most accurately describes the meaning of the corpus delicti requirement? A body has been produced which serves as evidence that a murder has been committed. A confession outside court by a defendant without corroborating evidence is insufficient. The prosecution has produced proof that the specific crime charged has been committed. The prosecution can prove murder without having to prove the death was not accidental