Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

The Court of Appeal in Nesbit v Porter held that the test for whether goods were of acceptable quality was: Select one: a.That they should

The Court of Appeal in Nesbit v Porter held that the test for whether goods were of acceptable quality was: Select one: a.That they should be fit for all purposes for which goods of the type in question are normally used and meet the other standards referred to in s 7(1) of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, such as being free from minor defects. b.That they should be fit for all purposes for which goods of the type in question are normally used. The other standards referred to in s 7(1) of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 were meaningless and should be ignored. c.That they should be fit for all purposes for which goods of the type in question are normally used. The other standards referred to in s 7(1) of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, such as being free from minor defects, would be relevant in the case of imported goods only.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

The Fiscal Impact Handbook

Authors: David Listokin

1st Edition

1138535672, 978-1138535671

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions