The Crafts' home was supplied with gas by the city gas company. Because of some misunderstanding, the gas company believed that the Crafts were delinquent in paying their gas bill. The gas company had an informal complaint procedure for discussing such matters, but the Crafts had never been informed that such a procedure was available. The gas company notied the Crafts that they were delinquent and that the company was shutting off the gas. The Crafts brought an action to enjoin the gas company from doing so on the theory that a termination without any hearing was a denial of due process. The lower courts held that the interest of the Crafts in receiving gas was not a property interest protected by the due process clause and that the procedures the gas company followed satised the requirements of due process. The Crafts appealed. Were they correct in contending that they had been denied due process of law? Why or why not? [Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division 7/. Cm', _...._ I "f'r-\"- I" -I - 1.. - I - _...-..._