The Davises reside in a house located on four acres of property, property zoned for low$-$density residential or agricultural use. In $2004,$ the property across the highway from the Davises was rezoned for heavy industrial use. Toyo Tire began building a tire manufacturing and distributing facility on $260$ acres located across the highway from the Davises. Since Toyo began operating in $2006,$ it has expanded $3$ times, growing from $400$ employees and production of $3,000$ tires per day to a planned fourth expansion to $1,450$ employees and production of $13,500$ tires per day. The plant operates $24$ hours per day in two $12-$hour shifts.

$$

The Davises experienced the problems of loud noises, bright lights, black$-$dust emissions, and traffic from employees and delivery trucks. An appraiser determined that the presence and growth of the plant reduced the value of the Davises$$ property by $35-40\%,$ with an additional $15\%$ reduction for the black dust.

$$

The Davises: $$

a$.$have no remedy because they moved to the nuisance.

b$.$cannot obtain an injunction because they are alone in being affected.

c$.$will need to establish something more than noise and dust to establish a nuisance.

d$.$none of the aboveThe Davises reside in a house located on four acres of property, property zoned for low$-$density residential or agricultural use. In $2004,$ the property across the highway from the Davises was rezoned for heavy industrial use. Toyo Tire began building a tire manufacturing and distributing facility on $260$ acres located across the highway from the Davises. Since Toyo began operating in $2006,$ it has expanded $3$ times, growing from $400$ employees and production of $3,000$ tires per day to a planned fourth expansion to $1,450$ employees and production of $13,500$ tires per day. The plant operates $24$ hours per day in two $12-$hour shifts.

$$

The Davises experienced the problems of loud noises, bright lights, black$-$dust emissions, and traffic from employees and delivery trucks. An appraiser determined that the presence and growth of the plant reduced the value of the Davises$$ property by $35-40\%,$ with an additional $15\%$ reduction for the black dust.

$$

The Davises: $$

a$.$have no remedy because they moved to the nuisance.

b$.$cannot obtain an injunction because they are alone in being affected.

c$.$will need to establish something more than noise and dust to establish a nuisance.

d$.$none of the above