The D.C. Circuit is reviewing a claim that the Open Internet Order violates a telecom company's rights under the First Amendment of the Constitution. For purposes of evaluating this constitutional claim only, what is the appropriate standard of review for the D.C. Circuit to apply to the review of the FCC's actions? Group of answer choices de novo review because all constitutional claims are reviewed de novo by the appellate court. "Is the agency's intrepretation of the statute pemissible?" because the constitutional claim will be given Chevron deference. It is impossible to tell because we do not know enough about the claim to determine the standard of review. The D.C. Circuit would not under any circustances review a claim that an agency's action was unconstitutional, therefore there is no review of this First Amendment claim