The debate over the transfer of copyrighted materials on the Internet continues to rage even in wake of the Napster case.Please read the full decision of the Ninth Circuit inA&M Records,et al. v. Napster,et al,239 F. 3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/114/896/2343353/

and discuss the following:

[1] In light of the protections afforded ISPs under the Communications Decency Act, is the imposition of vicarious liability for copyright infringement fair?

[2] Do you agree with the Court's finding that Napster's activities are distinguishable from the Sony Corporation's development and marketing of video recorders?

[3] Did the Court strike a proper balance between the rights of the copyright holder with free access to information on the Internet, or does the decision go too far in protecting the rights of the music industry?