The decision that the court reached in this matter was that Cooper did not have the legal right to seek reimbursement for the presents that he had given to Julie and Janet. The court decided that Cooper had voluntarily given the gifts to Julie and Janet, and that there was no evidence to suggest that Julie and Janet had pledged to marry Cooper in exchange for the goods that Cooper had given them. When receiving gifts from Cooper, Julie and Janet did it in a morally responsible manner. They did not make any assurances to Cooper that they would marry him in exchange for the gifts, nor did they take any action to coerce Cooper into giving them the goods. Cooper was the one who voluntarily presented the gifts, and there was nothing improper about the way Julie and Janet accepted them.

When Cooper attempted to have the gifts returned, he did so in an ethical manner. After getting into an argument with Julie and then leaving her home, he decided to sue her and her friend Janet. Cooper did not make any attempt to take advantage of Julie and Janet; in fact, he did not suit them until after his relationship with Julie had already come to an end. Cooper was entitled to a trial to decide whether he was entitled to recover the gifts, and the Court ruled in favor of Julie and Janet. Cooper was entitled to a trial to determine whether he was entitled to recover the gifts.

In the big picture, everyone who was involved did the right thing. Cooper was generous with his presents, and Julie and Janet graciously received them without any expectation of a marriage proposal in return from Cooper. The lawsuit was filed by Cooper after he and Julie had already parted ways with one another. The court decided in favor of Julie and Janet, coming to the conclusion that Cooper did not have the legal right to demand reimbursement for the presents.

Is it correct that Julie and Janet received the gifts from Cooper in a morally responsible manner?