Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
The dissent in this case pointed out that Congress had ample opportunity to add sexual orientation into the statute, but did not. The dissent accused
The dissent in this case pointed out that Congress had ample opportunity to add sexual orientation into the statute, but did not. The dissent accused the majority of filling in a portion of Title VII that the court found lacking, but the legislature has not changed the law in decades. Is that a compelling argument? Why or why not? Did the court "legislate from the bench"?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started