The Extreme Beauty salon leased space from Maher and Associates. Crazy Pet dog grooming service was also leasing space from Maher and Associates in the same building. Extreme Beauty's owners constantly complained that the noise and odors from the Crazy Pet grooming drove away their customers and employees. Maher and Associates did not (do) anything about these repeated complains. Eventually the Extreme Beauty salon moved out leaving several months of rent unpaid. When Maher and Associates sued for unpaid rent, the Extreme Beauty said that they did not owe any rent payments.

What is the legal basis for Extreme Beauty's claim?Explain. Who do you think will most likely win and why?