Question
The federal courts and the state courts can never have concurrent jurisdiction over the same case. (true or false). 2 Mark, a resident of Illinois,
- The federal courts and the state courts can never have concurrent jurisdiction over the same case. (true or false).
2 Mark, a resident of Illinois, while driving on the freeway, hits Bill, a resident of Wisconsin, and totally destroys Bill's brand new vehicle and injures Bill. Bill may bring suit in federal district court:
a. Because of federal question jurisdiction.
b. Because there is always federal jurisdiction if there is diversity of citizenship.
c. If the value of the car is $80,000.
d. If the accident occurred outside of Illinois or Wisconsin.
3 A decision of the Supreme Court of the state of Washington would always be binding on:
a. A federal district court in the state of Washington.
b. A state trial court in Washington.
c. The U.S. Court of Appeals that includes the state of Washington.
d. All of the above.
- Janet is called for jury duty and is selected for possible service on a jury. However, when the defendant's attorney sees her, he notices that she is wearing a green dress. Both the defendant and the defendant's attorney hate green dresses, so they strike her name from the jury. This is:
a. A valid challenge for cause.
b. A valid peremptory challenge.
c. Not a valid challenge.
d. A valid challenge for cause, but it can be overcome if the plaintiff's attorney makes an offer of proof to the judge.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started