the fev Me wh den the 23-5. Spotlight on Apple-Implied Warranties. Alan Vitt purchased an iBook G4 laptop computer from Apple, Inc. Shortly after the one-year war- ranty expired, the laptop failed to work due to a weakness in the product manufacture. Vitt sued Apple, arguing that the laptop should have lasted at least a couple of years," which Vitt believed was a reasonable con- sumer expectation for a laptop. Vitt claimed that Apple's descriptions of the laptop as "durable, rugged, reliable, | and "high performance were affirmative statements concern- ing the quality and performance of the laptop, which Apple did not meet. How should the court rule? Why? [Vitt v. Apple Computer, Inc., 469 Fed.Appx. 605 (9th Cir. 2011)] (See Implied Warranties.) bec oth ren 23 - C