The following facts come from a 2001 Ontario Court of Appeal case. On the basis of these facts, should a defence of entrapment succeed? In answering the question, cite 2 cases on point and summarize the law briefly.

A.B. drove to Hamilton with some friends to attend a Marilyn Manson (remember him?) concert at Copps Coliseum. He brought with him $30 worth of marijuana that he had purchased, intending to smoke it at the concert with his friends. While standing outside a Harvey's restaurant in the vicinity, A.B. was approached by two undercover officers dressed in the attire of Marilyn Manson concert goers. The officers wore white face makeup and black wigs. One of the officers approached A.B. and, after making a comment that he was unable to find any drugs in Hamilton, asked if anyone knew where he could "score some weed". At that point, A.B. responded and asked how much the officer was looking for. The officer replied he just wanted enough "for a few joints...a dime". A.B. testified that he was hungry and wanted to buy some food but he did not have any money. While he discussed whether he should sell any of the marijuana with his friends, the officer continued to press for the sale. A.B. then told the officer to meet him in the washroom of Harvey's, sold $10 of marijuana, and was arrested.