The following is an argument discussed in class. This argument can be understood as being composed of two smaller arguments: the first smaller argument produces a conclusion that serves as a premise in the second smaller argument. Symbolize those two smaller arguments with the standard connectives &,,,, parentheses (, ), and no more than 5 atomic sentences. (5 atomic sentences in total. 4 of them are used for the first smaller argument; 4 of them are used for the second)

Your justification of induction is not good. To see why, note that, if your justification of induction is good, it must be an argument that induction is reliable. But if it is such an argument, it must be either deductive or inductive. The former case is impossible. So now we have this: if your justification of induction is good, it must be an inductive argument that induction is reliable. But if it is such an argument, it is a circular argument (in that it uses induction to justify induction itself) and circular arguments are not good justifications. Hence, it is not a good justification.