The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the amount of mercury in consumable fish, where consumable fish should only contain at most 1 mg/kg of mercury. In Florida, bass fish were collected in 52 different lakes to measure the amount of mercury in the fish from each of the 52 lakes. Do the data provide enough evidence to show that the fish in all Florida lakes have lower mercury than the allowable amount? State the random variable, population parameter, and hypotheses.

1. The symbol for the random variable involved in this problem is?
2. The wording for the random variable in context is as follows:Select an answer

the mercury level in fish of a randomly selected Florida lake

a randomly selected Florida lake

the mean mercury level in fish of all Florida lakes

the mean mercury level in fish of 52 randomly selected Florida lakes

all Florida lakes

the mercury level in fish

52 randomly selected Florida lakes

3.The symbol for the parameter involved in this problem is?

n

N

X

s

p

p

X

4.The wording for the parameter in context is as follows:Select an answer

52 randomly selected Florida lakes

the mean mercury level in fish of 52 randomly selected Florida lakes

a randomly selected Florida lake

all Florida lakes

the mean mercury level in fish of all Florida lakes

the mercury level in fish

the mercury level in fish of a randomly selected Florida lake

5.Fill in the correct null and alternative hypotheses.

1. H0:
2. H0:
3. HA:
4. A Type I error in the context of this problem would be
5. Select an answer

Rejecting that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is 1 mg/kg when the mean really is 1 mg/kg.

Rejecting that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is 1 mg/kg when the mean is really lower than that.

Rejecting that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is 1 mg/kg when the mean is really higher than that.

Rejecting that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is 1 mg/kg when the mean is really different from that.

Rejecting that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is lower than 1 mg/kg when the mean really is 1 mg/kg.

Rejecting that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is higher than 1 mg/kg when the mean really is 1 mg/kg.

Rejecting that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is different from 1 mg/kg when the mean really is 1 mg/kg.

Failing to reject that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is 1 mg/kg when the mean really is 1 mg/kg

Failing to reject that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is 1 mg/kg when the mean really is lower than that.

Failing to reject that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is 1 mg/kg when the mean really is higher than that.

Failing to reject that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is 1 mg/kg when the mean really is different than that.

Failing to reject that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is lower than 1 mg/kg when the mean really is 1 mg/kg.

Failing to reject that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is higher than 1 mg/kg when the mean really is 1 mg/kg.

Failing to reject that the mean mercury level in fish for all Florida lakes is different from 1 mg/kg when the mean really is 1 mg/kg.

6.A Type II error in the context of this problem would be