The format of your assignment should be similar to the caseyou are referencing, that is the CONCLUSION, RULE, APPLICATION, CONCLUSION, (CRAC) format.A clear CRAC outline is essential and should be the first step, followed by the CONTENT section of your assignment. See below for guidance.

OUTLINE

Conclusion - What was the conclusion drawn by the court?

Rule - What rule(s) is being applied in the case?

Application - State the facts of the case, reiterate the rules and explain how and why the rules apply to your set of facts. Additionally, indicate why the court ruled in the way that it did. This section accounts for 90% of your points and should be at leastone-pagelong. Try to be thorough and include your argument as to why the court decided the case in the manner that it did.

Conclusion - Restate your conclusion from paragraph one, include the word "therefore" in front of it.

CONTENT

1. Make the outline for your case that follows the CRAC format.
2. Remember that the guidelines instruct you to submit a case that is atleast two-pages long.
3. Yourfirst CONCLUSION should state the decision of the Court. Include the name of the Court, and whether it is a State or Federal Court, also state at what level the decision was rendered, that is the District, Appellate, Supreme etc.
4. Although your RULE should be somewhat brief, itmustclearlystate the rule of law used to decide the case. An example of a rule of law would be "theft over X dollarsis considered a felony."
5. The APPLICATION section is the most importantpart of the assignmentand90% of your points are earned here; therefore, it must be atleast one page long andshouldbegin with the phrase "In this case..." Since the APPLICATION accounts forthe majorityof points earned, it should providea comprehensive set of facts and background about the case being briefed. Assumeyour reader hasno knowledgeof the casefacts, and you have to convince them that the conclusion arrived at is correct based upon your reasoning in this section. The APPLICATION section of your assignment contains yourargument; make sure it is a strong one. When writing the APPLICATION section of the assignment your considerations should include:

• A strong argument willbegin with a comprehensive set of facts and those facts will interweave the RULE into the set of facts. Solid reasoning will convince the reader that theRULE applies to thefacts and it makes your argument believable. Provide as much information as you can even if you believe you sound redundant. State and restate your argument and do not make a statement without reinforcing it with your supporting rationale. Remember that this section provides an explanation for the reasoning behind theCONCLUSION. That is, the court determined that theCONCLUSION was X because...
• After making a statement youcan follow with "because" and continue to explain why the CONCLUSION arrived at is the correct one. Do not reason any statement without stating why and how. Attempt to provide as much support for your argument as you can forwhy the court ruled the way they did.Repetitionis key, reinforceyour argument by demonstrating that the stated RULE is applicable and it is supported by the case facts. Convince the readerwhythe RULE is applicable and statehowthe RULE applies to the case facts.

1. The final CONCLUSION should be the same as the first (opening) conclusion, however you should place the word "therefore" in front of it.

Grant and Debbie enter into a contract binding Grant personally to do some delicate cabinetwork. Grant assigns his rights and delegates performance of his duties to Clarence.

(a) On being informed of this, Debbie agrees with Clarence, in consideration of Clarence's promise to do the work, that Debbie will accept Clarence's work, if properly done, instead of the performance promised by Grant. Later, without cause, Debbie refuses to allow Clarence to proceed with the work, though Clarence is ready to do so, and makes demand on

Grant that Grant perform. Grant refuses. Can Clarence recover damages from Debbie? Can Debbie recover from Grant?

(b) Instead, assume that Debbie refuses to permit Clarence to do the work, employs another carpenter, and brings an action against Grant, claiming as damages the difference between the contract price and the cost to employ the other carpenter. Explain whether Debbie will prevail.