Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

00
1 Approved Answer

The HR department is trying to fill a vacant position for a job with a small talent pool. Valid applications arrive every week or so,

image text in transcribed

The HR department is trying to fill a vacant position for a job with a small talent pool. Valid applications arrive every week or so, and the applicants all seem to bring different levels of expertise. For each applicant, the HR manager gathers information by trying to verify various claims on the candidate's rsum, but some doubt about "fit" always lingers when a decision to hire or not is to be made.

Suppose that hiring an employee who is a bad fit for the company results in an error cost of $300, but failing to hire a good employee results in an error cost of $300 to the company. Although it is impossible to tell in advance whether an employee is a good fit, assume that the probability that an applicant is a "good fit" is 0.55, while the probability that an applicant is a "bad fit" is1?0.55=0.45

1

?

0.55

=

0.45

. Hiring an applicant who is a good fit, as well as not hiring an applicant who is a bad fit, results in no error cost to the company.

For each decision in the following table, calculate and enter the expected error cost of that decision.

DecisionReality

Expected Error CostGood FitBad Fitp=0.55p=0.45HireCost: 0Cost: $300Do Not HireCost: $300Cost: 0Suppose an otherwise qualified applicant applies for a job.

In order to minimize expected error costs, the HR department should the applicant.

image text in transcribed
The HR department is trying to fill a vacant position for a job with a small talent pool. Valid applications arrive every week or so, and the applicants all seem to bring different levels of expertise. For each applicant, the HR manager gathers information by trying to verify various claims on the candidate's rsum, but some doubt about \"fit\" always lingers when a decision to hire or not is to be made. Suppose that hiring an employee who is a bad t for the company results in an error cost of $300, but failing to hire a good employee results in an error cost of $300 to the company. Although it is impossible to tell in advance whether an employee is a good fit, assume that the probability that an applicant is a \"good t\" is 0.55, while the probability that an applicant is a \"bad t\" is 1 0.55 = 0.45. Hiring an applicant who is a good t, as well as not hiring an applicant who is a bad t, results in no error cost to the company. For each decision in the following table, calculate and enter the expected error cost of that decision. Reality Good Fit Bad Fit Decision p=o.55 p=o.45 Expected Error Cost Hire Cost: 0 Cost: $300 as Do Not Hire Cost: $300 Cost: 0 $ Suppose an otherwise qualied applicant applies for a job. In order to minimize expected error costs, the HR department should v the applicant

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Auditing Cases An Interactive Learning Approach

Authors: Steven M Glover, Douglas F Prawitt

4th Edition

0132423502, 978-0132423502

Students also viewed these Economics questions