Question
The Hubbardton Iron Works Corporation (HIWC), a Boston based company was established in 2000. Harold Tugman, IV founded the corporation which was privately owned at
The Hubbardton Iron Works Corporation (HIWC), a Boston based company was established in 2000. Harold Tugman, IV founded the corporation which was privately owned at the time, after retiring from General Tugboats Corporation. HIWC was original formed to provide ship repair services and earned the Department of Defense certified Alteration Boat Repair designation. Among its specialties were structural welding, piping system installation and repairs, electrical, painting, rigging, machinery and dry-dock work, as well as custom sheet metal fabrication. Other divisions of HIWC included Habitability Installation, Industrial Contracting and Alteration/Installation Teams. With its initial success and good return on investment the firms operated facilities in New Jersey, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Florida and Virginia. In 2008 the company went public and its initial public offering was very successful. The stock price rose from its initial value of $10 to its current level of $35 per share. There are currently 5 million shares outstanding. In 2010 the company issued 30 year bonds at par, with a face value of $1000 and a coupon rate of 10% per year and managed to raise $0 million for expansion. Currently, the AA rated bonds have 20 years left until maturity and are quoted at 91.5% of par. Over the past year, HIWC utilized a new method for fabricating composite material that the firms engineers developed. In June of last year, management established the Advanced Materials Group (AM Group), which was dedicated to pursuing technology. The firm recruited Harry Stone, a senior engineer, to head the group. Harry has an MBA from a prestigious university. Upon joining HIWC, Harry realized that most projects were being approved on a gut feeling approach. There were no formal acceptance criteria in place. Up until then, the company had been lucky in that most of its projects had been well selected and the company had benefited from good relationships with its clients and suppliers. This informal method has to change, said Harry to his assistant Stephanie, we cannot possibly be this lucky forever. We need to 2 calculate the firms cost of capital and use it in the future. Stephanie replied, Yes, Harry, why dont I crunch out the number and give them to you within the next couple of days? That sounds great, Stephanie, said Harry. My years of experience tell me that when it comes to the cost of capital for new projects, one size never fits all. As Stephanie began looking at the financial statements, she realized she was going to have to make some assumptions. 1. She assumed the new debt would cost about the same as the yield on the outstanding debt and would have the same rating. 2. She assumed the firm would continue raising capital for future projects by using the same target proportions as determined by the book values of debt and equity (see Table 1 for the recent balance sheet). 3. She assumed the equity beta (1.5) would be the same for all divisions. 4. She assumed the historical growth rates of earnings and dividends would continue at their historical rate (see Table 2 for earnings and dividends history). 5. She assumed the corporate tax would be 34%. 6. The 1-year Treasury bill yield was 4% and the expected return on the market portfolio was 10% TABLE 1 HIWC Balance Sheet (000s) Cash 5000 Accounts Receivable 10000 Inventory 20000 Total Current Assets 35000 Land&Buildings 43000 Plant&Equipment 45000 Total Fixed Assets 88000 Total Assets 123000 Accounts Payable 8000 Accruals 5000 Notes Payable 10000 Total Current Assets 23000 Long Term Debt 40000 Common Stock 5 million outstanding 50000 Retained Earnings 10000 Total Liabilities and Shareholder equity 123000 3 TABLE 2 HIWC Sales, Earnings and Dividend History (000s) Earnings Dividends Year Sales Per Share Per Share 2012 $24,000,000 $0.48 $0.10 2013 28,800,000 0.58 0.12 2014 36,000,000 0.72 0.15 2015 45,000,000 0.86 0.18 2016 57,750,000 0.96 0.20 2017 62,100,000 1.06 0.22 2018 74,520,000 1.20 0.25 Questions: 1. Why do you think Harry Stone wants to estimate the firms cost of capital? Is it justified to use the firms weighted average cost of capital as the divisional cost of capital? Explain. 2. How should Stephanie go about figuring the cost of debt? Calculate the firms cost of debt. 3. Comment on each of Stephanies assumptions. Are they realistic, why or why not? 4. Why is there a cost associated with a firms retained earnings? 5. How can Stephanie estimate the firms cost of retained earnings? Should it be adjusted for taxes? Explain. 6. Calculate the firms average cost of retained earnings. 7. How should Stephanie calculate the firms cost of capital? Calculate it and explain the various steps. 8. Can Harry assume the cost of capital calculated by Stephanie remains constant? Explain.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started