The information needed is pretty straight forward. This is what I need to write as a reply to the case study.

Ethical Decision Making and Worker Safety? You work as a country manager for an energy company in a developing country. In one of the projects, you discover that you must substitute one important piece of equipment that is located in the middle of the nuclear reactor. The intensity of the nuclear radiation in that location was extraordinarily high, which would represent a high nuclear dose potentially affecting the long-term health of the workers performing work there (e.g. workers could be at risk of developing cancer). As project manager, you are responsible for the profit and losses for the project. The contract is the most important for the country, and if the project is profitable you would most likely be promoted, with salary increases for your employees. The nuclear power plant is located in a depressed area of the country, where people have few employment options and are willing to do anything to feed their families. Generally, employers do not respect safety standards for employees. You have two basic options. You can arrange the work so that employees would receive radiation close to but not surpassing the legal limit. Profits would be maximized this way. You could also design and arrange the work in a way to minimize radiation, lowering profits significantly due to the lengthier time it will take to replace the equipment. You know that even if you choose the lower radiation option, you expect that the next manager would in the future make employees work at the higher radiation limits, so the present health benefit would most likely be negligible. You also know that workers sometimes disconnect their radiation-level counters in order to work extra hours and make extra money. The company's senior managers want the equipment to be replaced as soon as possible, regardless of the radiation dose received by the workers. What do you do? money. The company's senior managers want the equipment to be replaced as soon as possible, regardless of the radiation dose received by the workers. What do you do? Illegal Workers? You have begun working as a new supervisor on a construction site. The relatively low-skilled, highlabor positions are filled by men who have recently migrated to the United States. Several weeks after your promotion to supervisor, one of the recently hired managers takes you aside and explains that a previous manager, who is no longer with the company, had hired some employees who had provided false documentation when they were hired. This means that a few of the current employees were not legally permitted to work in the country. It is illegal to hire undocumented employees and this could lead to legal trouble for the firm. On the other hand, you are aware that these employees are merely trying to provide food for their families. What do you do? Consider the following questions: - who are all the potential stakeholders? - what are some questions that need to be answered? - what additional information needs to be known? - what is the "right" course of action? - who might disagree with you? why? 1. Briefly summarize the Case Study. 2. POST your response/reflection, considering the answers to some of the above questions. Consider the following questions: - who are all the potential stakeholders? - what are some questions that need to be answered? - what additional information needs to be known? - what is the "right" course of action? - who might disagree with you? why? 1. Briefly summarize the Case Study. 2. POST your response/reflection, considering the answers to some of the above questions